#45:

Mandatory email disclosure for judges

All Judges shall “immediately” supply a direct email address (through their Judicial Assistant, or directly), for all necessary communications (not a portal), to any and all parties without a lawyer representing them/ Pro Se litigants.

This email address shall receive and accept communications from a Pro’Se litigant for requesting hearing times, responding back to availability, and other forms of scheduling matters. Additionally, in the rare event that the courthouse has a challenge receiving documents/or that the Pro’Se litigant is challenged in getting their documents submitted to the courthouse, they have a secondary protective option  to submit all filings of all court motions, affidavits in support/or Opposition, Discovery, etc…,to the judge’s email address, which the court will accept as successfully submitted/filed. The judge shall submit this to each Pro’Se litigant immediately, via a document that the Pro’Se litigant will sign at the initial hearing/and filed in the court file – and if mailed, and it shall be in writing/with verifiable tracking, to the Pro’Se’s  listed address, and sent to the email of the Pro’Se party, upon 1^st availability/at the 1^st hearing unless the Pro’Se party is absent, then certainly no later than 3 business days after the 1^st hearing, and there must be a signed affidavit by the Judge to confirm this mailing, this affidavit must be recorded in the court’s folder, timely, for the judge to stay compliant. Judges that fail to do this, shall face a $5,000 fine, plus upon documented notice of the violation, if not fully cured within 3 days after such notice, the judge will be continually fined $750 a day, to the Pro’Se litigant, qualified immunity for the judge is revoked, and all legal fees, and all costs associated with this matter, shall be paid by the judge that violates this legislation. These legal fees and court costs awarded against a judge is not to be paid by the government/or by tax payers in any form. The Judge will pay such ordered monies, or garnished, or have all their assets frozen immediately, until these monies are paid in full. If a Pro’Se person phones the court, and audio and video records the call, and either speaks to a Judicial Assistant and or leaves the Judicial Assistant a voicemail message asking for the Judges email address/or the judicial Assistant’s email address, the email address must be furnished/by way of documented proof to the Pro’Se litigant, immediately if both parties are speaking live to each other on the phone, or must be mailed and or emailed the relevant email address with documented proof to the Pro’Se party within 5 business days, without exception. The Judicial Assistant’s furnishing of this email address must be in writing, and submit an affidavit under penalty of perjury, with full details, dates, times, and if applicable email address sent to and from/and or telephone number of the Pro’Se of the conversation, and this affidavit must be timely submitted and entered into the court file within 5 business days of furnishing the Pro’Se party the relevant email address. Failure to have this furnishing of the relevant email address with documented proof, as mentioned herein, shall be a breach/violation of this legislation at the judge’s responsibility and the judge will not have qualified immunity, and all same applicable damages and forms of relief, apply. This legislation becomes effective 3 months after being enacted. If any Judge violates this legislation for a 6^th time within 15 years, then that Judge shall be immediately suspended for 12 months without pay. Whistleblowers are eligible to pursue these funds. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. If the (whistleblower and or plaintiff loses – the whistleblower is only at risk if they were the sole plaintiff/if the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.

What do you think?

 Loading ...