Register, Donate or Volunteer & make a difference!

Detail Page


Government email enforcement

Government email enforcement

Every government agency shall have a working main email address, posted in the upper right corner of the home page, and every tabbed page, and this email shall be operable and functioning, and citizens have a right to conduct their business through that email address, and may use this email address to avoid a portal that gives no direct clear accountability of what was sent back to the citizen, or who the direct government person was to receive it, as it relates to that agency.

The government must accept documents from persons sent by way of direct email, and not force mailing/postage/or mandated mailings, or other such document inconveniences to citizens. It is prohibited to force a citizen to mail in documents, or fax documents, or to mandate a portal whereby the sender has no documentation/immediate proof, of what was precisely sent.

Also, the phone number, and which phone button/prompt to immediately press, to be immediately transferred/directly/ to speak to a live person shall also be clearly and concisely listed underneath that as well. Every government agency shall make that accessible as described herein, with the 1st set of prompt choices to have 1 option that goes to a live person. Staffing from each agency, shall keep a public record as to whom is handling these incoming calls, their logs, names of who they spoke with, and call durations. This must be fully implemented within 1 year of the passing of this successful legislation. Any failures (besides power outages, and such rare type unlikely documented events), to having this process running as described herein, by each such agency. Once this agency is notified/by email or otherwise, they shall have 3 days to fully remedy this matter, and if the matter is not remedied fully, than the person shall by the same means notify by email or otherwise of this malfunction or absence of the posted email address, they shall then have 3 more days to fully remedy this matter, and if the matter is not remedied fully after that, the person(s) shall give a last and final notice, and if 3 more days pass and the matter is not fully rectified, than the director/head person of that agency shall immediately resign within 2 business days after that, or shall be held personally liable for all costs, legal fees, and $1,000 per person, per day, per attempt. The offender(s) qualified immunity (if such person was/is a government employee/elected official/appointee) is stripped, without exception, for violating this legislation. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower.Either the 2nd notice or 3rd notice (to do both is okay) shall be sent by way of certified mail, recorded on video, to be eligible for an award for monies in the court of law. If the (whistleblower and or plaintiff loses – the whistleblower is only at risk if they were the sole plaintiff/if the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.

What do you think?

Should government entities continue to be allowed to not post their email addresses on their website/only provide you a portal to send Info/whereby you have no proof of what you sent them?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We cannot make this happen without your help – get involved and make a difference now.

Copyright 2021 All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(4) non-profit and non-partisan organization. Privacy Policy