PARTICIPATE :

Register, Donate or Volunteer & make a difference!

#24:

Conflicting interests transparency

All government executives, elected officials, and appointees, are required to disclose into a national database, all conflicting interests/and or possibly perceived conflicting interests of places of employment by their relatives/as to their government job with any of their siblings, all in-laws, parents, adult children, aunts, uncles, adult nieces, adult nephews, and all adult 1st cousins

If someone was working for the CFPB but their spouse was working for the Credit Bureau, or if someone worked for the FDA and their brother worked for a Big Pharma company, if someone worked for the FCC and their uncle worked for a television station, etc… these all would be situations of conflicting interest, pursuant to this legislation. Any person subject to this legislation that is in violation shall face penalties, and whistleblowers are eligible to collect monies as allowed in the whistleblower legislation. Any person who is in violation, and receives a warning to remedy, has 7 days to do so. If the violator still has not remedied this matter and receives a 2nd documented notice, they shall have 20 more days to remedy, and if still not remedied the violator shall be fined $2,000 a day, plus all costs, plus all legal fees. The offender(s) qualified immunity (if such person was/is a government employee/elected official/appointee) is stripped, without exception, for violating this legislation. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. If the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.

What do you think?

Executives of some government agencies regularly leave their post to take high paying executive roles in the private sector, even though lining this up while in the public sector is illegal:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We cannot make this happen without your help – get involved and make a difference now.

Leave A Comment

Copyright 2019 All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(4) non-profit and non-partisan organization. Privacy Policy