Register, Donate or Volunteer & make a difference!

Detail Page


Police video accountability

Police video accountability

All police officers shall have, and use, and be activated and operating, body cameras, with audio recording, at all active duty times, with the exception of police that are working undercover at that time/and or,  if they are in their pre calendared/pre notified, previously scheduled office meetings, and or, in the bathroom.

If a police officer has defective equipment, certified by affidavit under penalty of perjury by the officer and 3 other experts of the equipment/it is grounds for exemption of that alleged violation. In the event that there was no interaction with any citizens, there was no involvement in any close proximity with any citizens, and no investigation of any sort involving any citizens at that time and space, the police officer is also exempt. In the event that a police officer is in violation, they shall be fined $1,000 plus any and all costs, legal fees that are associated with that matter for the 1st violation, and the same for the 2nd violation, and same for the 3rd violation, during a 10 year period. For the 4th violation the officer will be fined $15,000 and shall be suspended each time for 90 days without pay. Police can also be whistleblowers if they witness such a violation of this legislation. In the event that the police agency (non-Federal and non-State) does not have money to fund the purchasing of the police camera/audio  equipment/ then the following officials and employees shall be suspended without pay, simultaneously, until such time as the funds are available and the equipment is purchased/Mayor, all City Council Members, All Commissioners, The top Police official, – again, all of these entities are suspended without pay. If the State does not have the money for the police audio and video cameras, then every staff member of congress in that State shall be suspended without pay until the funds are available. Any Mayor, Council Member, Commissioner, Top Police Officer that obstructs the immediate suspensions without pay, as mentioned herein, shall be fined $100,000, face a minimum of 6 months to a maximum 2 years in jail, must be served inside the jail/prison, no house arrest or anything else of the sort is permitted, and they shall be responsible for all legal fees, court costs, and other costs, and be subject to all collection methods/the stripping of account, pension, bankruptcy protections, and others, as mentioned herein. Any police officer/law enforcement officer who violates this legislation, your qualified immunity is stripped, without exception. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. Whistleblowers are eligible to collect monies on violations of this legislation. If the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement. This legislation will be in full effect, 12 months after the legislation is passed.

What do you think?

Should police always have the video/audio of their body cams turned on when on duty (except for the bathroom, inside internal meetings, etc.)?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We cannot make this happen without your help – get involved and make a difference now.

Copyright 2021 All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(4) non-profit and non-partisan organization. Privacy Policy