Handicap fines for doctors that write a false handicap prescription.
Any physician who knowingly writes a prescription for a handicap placard for a falsely disabled handicap person, or who is notified that the placard that they issued is to a person who seemingly does not meet the criteria/and the notice is accompanied with video footage, has 3 options:
Option #1 The prescribing doctor, within 45 days of receiving such a notice, must submit an affidavit under penalty of perjury that the person in question who was prescribed the placard meets the criteria for the placard because of permanent injuries/injuries without question are everlasting.
Option #2 The prescribing doctor must reevaluate the person within 45 days of such notice, or suspend the prescription, and upon evaluation of the placard holder, must submit an affidavit under penalty of perjury that the person qualifies legally for the placard.
Option #3 immediate suspend the placard from the placard holder, through an immediate documented/with tracking/notice to the State.
The Whistleblower must notify the doctor by email and also by certified mail. The certified mail must have full tracking, there must be a picture or video showing the envelope, the tracking 3 and address. The email must be sent a minimum of 3 times, with at least 2 other witnesses on the cc tab 9include 2 other parties as witnesses as to receiving the email, and documented notice to the state Board of Medicine by way of certified mail and or by way of email, to be eligible for the whistleblower money.
The doctor that issues/or retains the issuing of a handicap placard to a person that does not meet the legal threshold criteria of being handicapped as stated herein (now known as “willful and knowingly), will be fined, and excessive repeat violations in any capacity, will warrant jail time as stated herein. For a cycle of every 15 years, starting from the date of the enactment of this legislation (any new doctors shall have their 15 years start from the date they receive their license to practice medicine). An offense is defined as a handicap placard knowingly issued/prescribed to a non-qualifying recipient, and or allowing a prescribed handicap placard to remain active after being put on notice/as defined herein that a person seemingly does not qualify with attached video proof, and the person that was prescribed the placard does not meet the criteria of the handicap placard/and the doctor has not suspended the prescribed handicap placard. The 1st through 3rd offense(s), the fine will be anywhere from $3,000 – $10,000 levied against the physician – including all costs and fees mentioned later herein, any 4th offense and or beyond, shall incur a fine between $10,000 and $40,000, and pay all legal fees, costs associated with this violation – and also a minimum of 5 days in jail to a maximum of 4 months in jail, confinement must be in a jail, no house arrest or outside monitoring, and the full jail sentence must be served, and, whistleblowers are eligible.
(only 1 whistleblower per offense shall receive) all their deserved whistleblower monies, their costs and legal fees to pursue this action, plus 50% of the fine levied upon the physician, that is collected by the court, and small claims court is applicable, and the amount for small claims shall jump to a $200,000 max limit for these types of cases. The offender will pay, and will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. Whistleblowers are eligible to be compensated if this legislation is violated. The offender(s) qualified immunity (if such person was/is a government employee/elected official/appointee) is stripped, without exception, for violating this legislation. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation. This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. If the (whistleblower and or plaintiff loses – the whistleblower is only at risk if they were the sole plaintiff/if the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only) The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.
Loading ...
