PARTICIPATE :

Register, Donate or Volunteer & make a difference!

#38:

Mandatory electronic court forms

All courts shall provide online, with a direct clear and concise link, both sets of sample forms/blank forms and actual used filled out forms available as public records so that the public can better understand these forms/documents and view both sets as sample pleadings, motions, injunctions, etc…  and also an actual filled out previous public record that was previously filled out before, including court pleading, motion, injunction, etc…- for every semi common/occasionally used/, scenario (motion to dismiss, motion to compel, motion to compel for more definitive answers, motion for summary judgment, Affidavit in Opposition of Motion for Summary Judgment, etc…).

This shall be implemented within 1 calendar year from the passing of this legislation, the link will be clearly and concisely viewable on the home page of the court website, and if this is not fully implemented and operational, then the clerk of the court will be stripped of their qualified immunity, and be fined $4,000 and an additional $200 a day for every day thereafter, and if still not remedied after 45 days, then the clerk shall be suspended 60 days without pay, and then if it is still not remedied after that 60 day mark -the clerk will be suspended without pay for 6 months, and if still not fixed after that, then every person in that department shall be suspended without pay for 2 years. Whistleblowers are eligible to collect monies when this legislation is violated. The offender(s) qualified immunity (if such person was/is a government employee/elected official/appointee) is stripped, without exception, for violating this legislation. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. If the (whistleblower and or plaintiff loses – the whistleblower is only at risk if they were the sole plaintiff/if the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.

What do you think?

Should the courts provide sample forms, and real example forms, to make it easier for people to see how other lawyers/and other people have filled out the forms successfully?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We cannot make this happen without your help – get involved and make a difference now.

Leave A Comment

Copyright 2019 All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(4) non-profit and non-partisan organization. Privacy Policy