PARTICIPATE :

Register, Donate or Volunteer & make a difference!

#49:

Allow anonymous public records requests

Public records request can always be made anonymously.

When a person is merely making a public records request – Security, police, or any government employee is prohibited from demanding such person(s) identification, and prohibited from asking for such person(s) identification more than twice after such person puts them on notice that asking for identification for this related matter more than twice, to something of the effect that they are being put on formal notice that their actions are violating/about to violate such person(s) civil rights, and or that their actions creates civil liability and is unlawful and again being put on formal notice of such. If any government employee/quasi-government employee, in any capacity as mentioned herein violates a person’s rights (certainly if violated as described herein, the qualified immunity is stripped for that violator of this legislation without exception/they will have personal liability, regardless of where the government employee is working at that time including inside a building, over the phone, through the internet, and by any other means (excluding military installations, except if the military installation has normal public offices inside it). If any agency, Federal, state, and or local (in the same localized buildings/ area/city and or county) violates this legislation in whereby they are successfully sued/with a civil verdict against them/more than 3 times within any 10 year period/then from that point forward/date of judgment of the 3rd civil liability case as referenced herein, to be eligible for this extra protection of this legislation, of 3 verdicts of liability within a 10 year period, (any persons can make public records requests/within/for that particular building(s)/department/departments if in that building/if building is moved or department is relocated/all departments that are originally in that building/coming to and from that agency), are now permitted to wear masks on their face/covering their faces/wearing these masks, coming and going from that building/while in the building (so long as not a court room that is in session), free of police arrest, regardless of any other mask laws of any capacity whatsoever/which oversees any and all other mask laws,  – for the next 7 years, commencing after the 3rd civil judgment was successfully awarded within a 10 year period, and any law enforcement person who arrests such a person for wearing a mask/or for a false reason and civilly determined to be a false arrest/in this mask wearing related manner, and upon informing the police of the 3rd successful lawsuit verdict within 10 years, then the police will have their qualified immunity stripped. Video and audio footage will be needed for a person to be successful to be awarded monies as it relates to anyone violating this legislation. Any entity that violates this legislation in regards to the identification breach of this legislation shall face an automatic minimum of a $1,000 fine, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/fines for these matters, for the 1st , 2nd, and 3rd offense each. Any offense committed by the same government employee as subject to this legislation after their 3rd offense shall constitute a $5,000 fine, and 60 days suspension from work without pay.  Any police officer that wrongfully arrests a person wearing a mask after the 3rd agency verdict payout from violating this legislation, and upon them being notified, each officer notified and involved in the arrest shall be fined $20,000 and be suspended from work without pay for 6 months. Whistleblowers are eligible to pursue these funds. The offender(s) qualified immunity (if such person was/is a government employee/elected official/appointee) is stripped, without exception, for violating this legislation. The offender shall have any and all assets frozen, all fines/fees/legal fees, other costs, shall be paid by the offender. The offender will either be payroll deducted/garnished if still employed/and all assets shall be frozen until the whistleblowers monies are paid in full/if applicable, also, these fines and fees against the offender is not eligible to be discharged in bankruptcy, or any other manner, there is no statute of limitations, there are no bank accounts, monies, property, retirement accounts, trust funds, or other property or accounts that can be protected, as all these accounts are subject to be frozen/seized/sold if necessary, until such time as all fines, fees, costs, legal and other, are fully satisfied. The government/tax payers shall not pay for the legal defense of the person alleged to have violated this legislation. Any attorney working for or representing the government shall not be permitted to represent the person(s)(government employee/elected official/appointee) accused of violating this legislation.  This action can be brought in local, State, and or Federal court, of the relevant region, for enforceable court action. A small claims court, shall now have an exception for these whistleblower type cases as included/defined herein, to expand the limit to $200,000, including all costs/fees/ legal fees/interest/penalties/ damages/etc…whereby a whistleblower could have their matter heard. All small claim whistleblower matters shall be heard, in 4 months or less for the trial. Whistleblowers receive their 50% of the monies/as it comes in/half is continually diverted to the whistleblower. If the (whistleblower and or plaintiff loses – the whistleblower is only at risk if they were the sole plaintiff/if the whistleblower was not the sole plaintiff/the solely direct injured party/then the whistleblower has qualified immunity protection from all costs, fees, of any sort, in any capacity), the defendant and or government employee (herein defendant) fully prevails by judicial verdict/is victorious/found not to be liable in any capacity, by a judge’s order and verdict/jury verdict, then the defendant is entitled to be awarded all of their legal fees, costs, and all eligible awards and monies that they were facing/at risk to pay/in this legislation/and, the judge shall be eligible to award these monies to the defendant/and, fine these costs upon the Plaintiff. (government employee only)  The government may reimburse solely the government employee’s legal fees/legal fees only/nothing else of any sort, so long as the government employee prevailed by judicial verdict as described herein. The Plaintiff in this same scenario/if the judicial verdict is in favor of the government employee/the plaintiff would face all the same collectability risk(these monies/debts/ shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, all bank accounts and pensions are subject to being seized and or garnished, etc…). The onus for the defendant to prevail, to be awarded monies, is a burden of proof upon the government employee, therefore a verdict/decision, signed by a judge, declaring that the defendant/government employee was absolutely free of all liability/wrong doing, is required for the defendant to be eligible to be awarded and collect monies. Any form of settlement, does not meet this threshold for any award of monies on either side beyond the terms and conditions agreed upon in the executed settlement agreement.

What do you think?

The government often forces people to present ID when they have done nothing wrong, or when making a public records request. We should:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

We cannot make this happen without your help – get involved and make a difference now.

Leave A Comment

Copyright 2019 All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(4) non-profit and non-partisan organization. Privacy Policy